Friday, November 22, 2024: It was Philcon or the Philadelphia Science Fiction Conference time again at the Double Tree by Hilton Hotel in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, and the first place I headed to after registering was 1) the Convention Suite or Con Suite. As in other years, in a living-room setting, I ate some snack foods, drank some soft drinks, and conversed with other science fiction (SF) fans. Meanwhile, similar to other Philcons, this SF con offered many different tracks of programming: animation, art, and costuming, as well as fandom gossip, filk music (mostly folk tunes with SF or fantasy lyrics), gaming, horror, literary SF, media SF, and science. The con also included writing workshops, exhibits, and other fixed functions for three days. Back down on the main floor, I attended my first panel: 2) Let’s Design a New SF Television Show where James Cambias, Bjon Hasseler, Jim (Straton) Reichert, Bob Hrannek, and Christopher Stout gave their opinions and listened to the opinions from the audience on what kind of SF TV show they would like to see. Some of the topics they talked about had to do with characters, settings, and plots, as well as reminding people that there have been differences when producing a TV show with actors vs. an animated series. They also covered the who, what, where, why, when, and how of the stories (the five W’s and H in journalism); and what the viewers would learn at the end of the story. Someone also mentioned how accurate the science should be and how much made up science should be in the story depending on whether it would be a hard SF story, soft SF story, or science fantasy. At the next panel, 3) A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Con… Roberta Rogow, Michael A. Ventella, and Ian Randal Strock told of mishaps, awkward moments, and other unusual stuff that happened at past SF cons. Some of the subjects covered involved fire alarms going off at the hotel (I am well aware of this myself.), trying to talk with SF fans born after 1977 (another thing I'm familiar with), Harlen Ellison stories, as well as stories of hookers looking for “big spenders” at conventions, fanzine stories, costume stories (wardrobe malfunctions), and so on. Some of the stories became very risque.
Saturday, November 23, 2024: Just like the year before, I started Philcon’s busiest day by visiting the 4) Art Show. Here I noticed that about 90% of the art presented fantasy art, and the rest showed SF and space art. Around three-fourths of the art on exhibit were paintings and drawings, and the remaining art on display included other mediums: jewelry, sculptures, tote bags, pillows, pottery, etc. Then, I listened in on the following panel: 5) How Real Does the Science in SF Have To Be?--where Barna William Donovan, Melanie Moyer, James L. Cambais, Lawrence Krammer, and Inga Heyer asked what would have made the made-up science in SF believable? If it was a comedy, did the made-up science have to be believable? They agreed that even if the main emphasis were on the characters, the made-up science should be believable, and the rules of this made-up science should be consistent. How much made-up science would be in the story depended on whether the story was hard-SF, soft SF, or science fantasy. (In hard SF, such as stories found in Analog Magazine, most editors only allowed one or two made-up science rules: the rest of the science had to be real. Soft-SF stories, such as Star Trek, allowed for more made-up science, but most of the rest of the science had to be real. For science fantasy, such as Star Wars, much of the science was of the made-up kind.) Next, I sat in on the 6) Bias Automation panel. Thus, Bob Hranek, Jazz Hiestand, Odele Pax, and Gill Cnaan talked about using artificial intelligence or AI in learning. They also mentioned that currently AI could not think for itself. Another topic discussed was ChatGDP and that in legal matters, it was only accurate 40% of the time. Overall, many of the abilities in AI that people have been concerned about, as of the date above, have been impossible—until it does become possible!
Saturday Night: After I changed for the evening, I went to the following panel: 7) Socialization vs. Privatization of Space. On this panel, Earl Bennett, Tobias F. Cabral, Inge Heyer, Joseph Haughey, and Mark Roth Whitworth conversed about the pros & cons of government backed space missions vs. private companies backing those space missions. One of the pros with government: People have had a better say about the missions, but the cons included the government working slower. Thus with a private company, people had less of a say, but the private company could be quicker. Some missions would be too big for a private company to handle, but many small missions could be run by them. Nevertheless, it depended on the fuel used. Nobody wanted private companies running anything with nuclear power. This panel also talked about using one ship to go into space and then, assembling another, bigger ship in space; and getting rid of space junk in lower Earth orbit (LEO). (LEO is below the Van Allen Belts.) Someone suggested a government-run large space station where private companies could set up their equipment, but overall, perhaps it would be best to have some government control over the private companies in space, especially for worker safety and rights. Later I saw the 8) Masquerade. This masquerade only had 11 entries, and all except for one entry, they wore fantasy themed costumes. The SF entry was a “One Eyed, One Horned Flying Purple People Eater.” Finally, I watched what was supposed to be the half-time show in the Masquerade while the judges decided on the winners. However, because the Masquerade was so short, the judges were quick in deciding who the winners were. Therefore, the winners received their prizes, and the half time entertainment became the 9) After Masquerade Entertainment. I would have preferred a film or a filk singing group or singer, because in my opinion, the comedy was so-so. It was a set of questions given to a group of people as to why he or she was the best person to steal James Cameron’s Titanic.
Sunday, November 24: The last day of the con has mostly been low-key and this day was no exception. I started the day by going to the following: 10) What the US Navy Taught Me About Starfleet, presented by Christopher Weuve. By way of PowerPoint, Weuve compared how Starfleet differed from the Navy. After telling us the history of the Navy and how its vessels served in the different wars, he explained how battles on water were a lot different from battles in space, or what worked on water (or in water with a submarine) wouldn’t work in space. In addition, it had been mentioned in ST that Starfleet personnel have not been warriors first, unlike the current military. In his opinion, Starfleet has been closer to being similar to the Coast Guard than the Navy. Next, I went to spend some money in the 11) Dealers’ Room. Unlike other years, there were even more dealers selling reading materials: about two-thirds of the dealers sold books, magazines, comic books, and so forth. The remaining one-third sold other merchandise: jewelry, artworks, and t-shirts, as well as tote bags, holiday ornaments, mugs, web design services, games, etc. I ended up buying a book about the craft and business of writing. Before going home, I sat in on one more panel, 12) Set Phasers to Roast. Earl Bennett, Bob Hraner, Chris Weuve, and Jazz Hiestand mentioned examples of the worst weapons in SF and why. For example, in ST, a bolt of energy would come in pulses like the photon torpedoes, not a continuing line like the ship’s phasers. Somebody also said that Gene Roddenberry decided to call the weapons on ST phasers because lasers at that time were still in the early stages of development. Thus, in later years, when lasers developed more, he didn’t want someone looking back and saying that ST’s lasers couldn’t do this or that. By called them phasers, they remain fictional—at least for a long time. What I found most interesting was the panel explaining the differences among the type #1, type #2, and type #3 civilizations: type #1 used the Earth’s resources, type #2 used the resources of the solar system, and type #3 used the resources of the galaxy. Anyway that summed up Philcon 2024 for me.